Difference between revisions of "T5ET051"
From SDU
m (Removed link to service provider) |
m |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | __NOTOC__ | |
| − | + | {{Global Header}} | |
| + | {{Global Announcement}} | ||
| + | == Overview == | ||
| + | This test patch is a result of the cumulative patch breaking the migration. | ||
PROBLEM SYMPTOM: NT -MIGRATING CONTACT_TYPE TABLE WITH CUSTOMIZATION FROM R6 to R11.2 | PROBLEM SYMPTOM: NT -MIGRATING CONTACT_TYPE TABLE WITH CUSTOMIZATION FROM R6 to R11.2 | ||
| − | |||
---------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------- | ||
While you migrate from USVD 6.0 to USRD 11.2 and if you have customizations on table Contact_Type | While you migrate from USVD 6.0 to USRD 11.2 and if you have customizations on table Contact_Type | ||
| Line 10: | Line 12: | ||
you might get in pgm_migration.log file the following error: | you might get in pgm_migration.log file the following error: | ||
| + | ''Could not find part table for ca_contact_Type'' | ||
| + | or | ||
| + | ''Could not find part table for ca_contact'' | ||
| − | + | So if you run into this again you can request this test fix. | |
| − | + | ||
| − | So if you run into this again you can request this test fix | + | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
Latest revision as of 01:04, 27 July 2008
To make corrections or additions to this article, select the edit tab above.
To discuss or ask questions about this article, select the discussion tab above.
To discuss or ask questions about this article, select the discussion tab above.
Overview
This test patch is a result of the cumulative patch breaking the migration.
PROBLEM SYMPTOM: NT -MIGRATING CONTACT_TYPE TABLE WITH CUSTOMIZATION FROM R6 to R11.2
While you migrate from USVD 6.0 to USRD 11.2 and if you have customizations on table Contact_Type or Contact Tables
you might get in pgm_migration.log file the following error: Could not find part table for ca_contact_Type or Could not find part table for ca_contact
So if you run into this again you can request this test fix.
